← All issues
VanEck: Bitcoin Miners Face $50B Funding Gap as AI Pivot Separates Winners from Losers

VanEck: Bitcoin Miners Face $50B Funding Gap as AI Pivot Separates Winners from Losers

· By Mansa Muhammad

The distinction between Bitcoin miners and AI infrastructure providers is no longer theoretical; it is being priced into the market through a massive capital deficit. A new framework from VanEck reveals a roughly $50 billion near-term funding gap separating the sector’s stated ambitions from its actual delivery.

The market is currently rewarding physical reality over promises. VanEck analysts Griffin MacMaster and Matthew Sigel argue that because financial disclosures vary and cash flows remain nascent, gross energized power—the amount of megawatts actually switched on—is the only reliable metric for investors. This distinction creates a sharp valuation divide between companies with physical leases and those still in the pipeline.

The data shows a clear premium for execution. Companies holding physical leases, such as Cipher Mining (CIFR), Hut 8 (HUT), and TeraWulf (WULF), are trading at valuations above 10x gross energized power. In contrast, companies like Marathon Digital (MARA) and CleanSpark (CLSK), which remain tied to Bitcoin mining with limited contracted AI capacity, trade at just 2–6x that same metric.

This divergence highlights a massive execution risk. Across the peer group, miners have delivered only approximately 25% of their leased capacity. VanEck expects this percentage to decline further before it improves, as large-scale construction projects are not expected to kick off until 2027 and 2028.

The implications for the sector are structural. The market is currently paying for contracted and energized capacity while discounting pipeline announcements. As companies move toward the busy second half of 2026—with Bitdeer (BTDR), HIVE Digital (HIVE), Riot Platforms (RIOT), and Core Scientific (CORZ) in various stages of lease negotiations—the ability to hit construction milestones will dictate survival. Those that fail to transition from miners to infrastructure providers risk structural de-ratings.

The challenge is not just securing power, but managing it. Very few companies in this group possess the experience required to build the specific infrastructure AI customers demand. Project management credentials may soon become as vital as megawatt counts.

Watch the progress of lease negotiations in 2026; the gap between announced capacity and energized power will determine which players survive the transition.

Subscribe to The Mansa Report

Strategic intelligence on AI, business building, and the future of technology. Delivered Monday through Friday.